eaw/u-boot
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

x86: Simplify acpi_device_infer_name()

Browse Source 
There is no-longer any need to check if sequence numbers are valid, since
this is ensured by driver model. Drop the unwanted logic.

Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
This commit is contained in:
Simon Glass
2020-12-16 21:20:23 -07:00
parent df3dc20952
commit d1e85308fe
2 changed files with 4 additions and 29 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
test/dm/acpi.c
View File

@@ -123,7 +123,7 @@ UCLASS_DRIVER(testacpi) = {
static int dm_test_acpi_get_name(struct unit_test_state *uts)
{
char name[ACPI_NAME_MAX];
struct udevice *dev, *dev2, *i2c, *spi, *serial, *timer, *sound;
struct udevice *dev, *dev2, *i2c, *spi, *timer, *sound;
struct udevice *pci, *root;
/* Test getting the name from the driver */
@@ -146,10 +146,6 @@ static int dm_test_acpi_get_name(struct unit_test_state *uts)
ut_assertok(acpi_get_name(spi, name));
ut_asserteq_str("SPI0", name);
/* The uart has no sequence number, so this should fail */
ut_assertok(uclass_first_device(UCLASS_SERIAL, &serial));
ut_asserteq(-ENXIO, acpi_get_name(serial, name));
/* ACPI doesn't know about the timer */
ut_assertok(uclass_first_device(UCLASS_TIMER, &timer));
ut_asserteq(-ENOENT, acpi_get_name(timer, name));