dm: core: Use dev_has_ofnode() instead of dev_of_valid()
We have two functions which do the same thing. Standardise on dev_has_ofnode() since there is no such thing as an 'invalid' ofnode in normal operation: it is either null or missing. Also move the functions into one place. Signed-off-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -30,22 +30,6 @@ static inline const struct device_node *dev_np(const struct udevice *dev)
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* dev_ofnode() - get the DT node reference associated with a udevice
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @dev: device to check
|
||||
* @return reference of the the device's DT node
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline ofnode dev_ofnode(const struct udevice *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return dev->node;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline bool dev_of_valid(const struct udevice *dev)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return ofnode_valid(dev_ofnode(dev));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#ifndef CONFIG_DM_DEV_READ_INLINE
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user